EU News Digest Latest News & Updates
Getty Images
Attendees wait for the start of the 2017 Apple Worldwide Developer Conference (WWDC) at the San Jose Convention Center on June 5, 2017 in San Jose, California.
A group of Taiwanese manufacturers are joining Apple’s legal battle against Qualcomm in a countersuit, claiming the chipmaker charges excessive fees for patent licenses and violates anti-trust laws, reports the Wall Street Journal. Apple is covering the legal expenses associated with the companies’ defense and said it would file a separate motion to consolidate the manufacturer’s countersuit with its own.
Contract manufacturers Foxconn Technology, Compal Electronics, Pegatron Corp, and Wistron Corp had planned to file a lawsuit against Qualcomm in the federal district court in San Diego on Tuesday night. Notably, the companies assemble iPhones and iPads for Apple. Qualcomm is the market leader in smartphone modems and a primary supplier to Apple, yet Apple doesn’t have a direct patent deal with Qualcomm — it pays licensing fees to the four manufacturers who then pay Qualcomm. Apple stopped making payments to the four after it sued Qualcomm in January for $1 billion, thus making the manufacturers’ involvement in the legal tussle seemingly inevitable.
More from The Verge
This super-stretchy wearable feels like a second skin and can record data
Google is using the impending death of its blob emoji to promote Allo
Nokia 8 revealed in leaked images with dual-camera Zeiss optics
It’s the latest episode in a long and sordid saga. In May, Qualcomm sued the four Taiwanese manufacturers for “failing to provide royalty payments.” In July, Qualcomm asked the US government to ban new iPhones from coming into the country and to stop sales of devices that were already in the US.
Qualcomm is also being sued by the United States Federal Trade Commission for anti-competitive practices. Qualcomm had previously said that it has “never withheld or threatened to withhold chip supply in order to obtain agreement to unfair or unreasonable licensing terms,” despite accusations to the contrary by Apple and now others.
